While qooxdoo is hurling towards 1.0 there is this question that is
bugging me.
I have learned, that using anonymous functions leads to grief when
debugging. So instead of
server.callAsync(function(ret,exc,id){
\\ handler code
},arg1,arg2,arg3);
I am writing
function handler(ret,exc,id){
\\ handler code
}
server.callAsync(handler,arg1,arg2,arg3);
unfortunately handler runs out of scope. I can therefore not
access 'this' inside the handler. Unless I pass this into the
handler with the var that=this trick.
It works fine but it makes it impossible (afaik) to setup handlers
as private methods in the object.
In other methods like addListener it is possible to pass along the
scope the handler should be run in.
I would realy like to see a callAsyncScoped call that works similar
to addListener:
callAsyncScoped(handler,scope,arg1,arg2,....)
cheers
tobi
--
Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland
http://it.oetiker.ch [email protected] ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
