On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:32 PM, thron7 <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > I think that my opinion is that if the polyfill can be implemented 100%
> to
> > the spec, there should be no problem doing it. If it can't be done 100%
> to
> > the spec, it's probably better left without the polyfill.
>
> But, according to your own reasoning, that would rule out most polyfills,
> wouldn't it?!
>
I suspect not. I haven't evaluated them, or done any research, but I
suspect that many of the modern functions missing from older browsers can
be implemented fully to the spec. I happened to see the comment regarding
bind() that I quoted, indicating that it might be difficult to do properly.
I think it would take a bit of research to see if there are known 100%
polyfills for the methods under consideration.
Derrell
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
