Perhaps it would be best if you told us what you are trying to do, what exactly is the event you are trying to trap?
On 12/12/2015 2:26 AM, Sowmya Manapragada wrote: > Thanks all for your comments, but if that's expected , I need to depend on > something other than the system / peer status words for trapping the > correct sequence of events? > what I mean is even when my server is not reachable and system status word > rv 0 = 0615 ..it means to the client (0 leap_none, 6- sync_ntp,1 event, > 5-clock_sync).. and only after 7 to 8 minutes rv 0 status changes and > gives the correct status that the "server peer" is unreachable, same with > the client associations status: only after 6 to 8 minutes client shows it > has lost the server peer ( not reachable) ..am I missing something here ? > > thanks, > Shyam > On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Sowmya Manapragada <skoga...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Thanks all for your comments, but if that's expected , I need to depend on >> something other than the system / peer status words for trapping the >> correct sequence of events? >> what I mean is even when my server is not reachable and system status word >> rv 0 = 0615 ..it means to the client (0 leap_none, 6- sync_ntp,1 event, >> 5-clock_sync).. and only after 7 to 8 minutes rv 0 status changes and >> gives the correct status that the "server peer" is unreachable, same with >> the client associations status: only after 6 to 8 minutes client shows it >> has lost the server peer ( not reachable) ..am I missing something here ? >> >> thanks, >> Shyam >> >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 5:30 PM, <questions-requ...@lists.ntp.org> wrote: >> >>> Send questions mailing list submissions to >>> questions@lists.ntp.org >>> >>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >>> http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions >>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >>> questions-requ...@lists.ntp.org >>> >>> You can reach the person managing the list at >>> questions-ow...@lists.ntp.org >>> >>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >>> than "Re: Contents of questions digest..." >>> >>> >>> Today's Topics: >>> >>> 1. Re: Observation with ntp4.2.8@p4-request inputs (brian utterback) >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> Message: 1 >>> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 08:01:14 -0500 >>> From: brian utterback <brian.utterb...@oracle.com> >>> To: elliott...@comcast.net, "'Sowmya Manapragada'" >>> <skoga...@gmail.com>, questions@lists.ntp.org >>> Subject: Re: [ntp:questions] Observation with ntp4.2.8@p4-request >>> inputs >>> Message-ID: <5669779a.7040...@oracle.com> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 >>> >>> Yes, that is the expected behavior. >>> >>> On 12/10/2015 6:55 AM, Charles Elliott wrote: >>>> FWIIW, I have seen a similar phenomenon, only with one server. If the >>> time >>>> server on my network stops dispensing time for some reason, the >>> computers on >>>> the LAN will still stay sync'ed to its last observation long after the >>> reach >>>> indicator goes to zero. Not sure if that is right. >>>> >>>> Charles Elliott >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: questions >>>> [mailto:questions-bounces+elliott.ch=comcast....@lists.ntp.org] On >>> Behalf Of >>>> Sowmya Manapragada >>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2015 10:26 PM >>>> To: questions@lists.ntp.org >>>> Subject: [ntp:questions] Observation with ntp4.2.8@p4-request inputs >>>> >>>> Hello All, >>>> Just wanted to check if what I am observing with4.2.8p4 is as expected >>> or I >>>> missed out something because I don't see this with older 4.2.8p2/p3 :I >>> have >>>> a client having 2 NTP servers (both servers in my LAN ), client makes >>> one as >>>> a peer ( to which it is currently synced) and other as a candidate; the >>> peer >>>> (server) goes down, my client at least waited 7 to 8 min to reject this >>> peer >>>> server and choose the available one... Checked in Mein berg monitor tool >>>> also and rv0 command ... The status word just don't show that client >>>> rejected server until 7 to 8 minutes... Wire shark correctly shows no >>>> packets exchanged between my clint and peer ( right from moment when >>> server >>>> which is down)..my client ntp.conf is standard with an iburst... >>>> Thanks in advance >>>> Shyam >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> questions mailing list >>>> questions@lists.ntp.org >>>> http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> questions mailing list >>>> questions@lists.ntp.org >>>> http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions >>> -- >>> Oracle <http://www.oracle.com> >>> Brian Utterback | Principle Software Engineer >>> Phone: +1 6038973049 <tel:+1%206038973049> >>> Oracle Systems/RPE Solaris Network >>> 1 Oracle Dr. | Nashua, NH 03062 >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> All working systems eventually start to exhibit their own agenda >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Green Oracle <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to >>> developing practices and products that help protect the environment >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Subject: Digest Footer >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> questions mailing list >>> questions@lists.ntp.org >>> http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> End of questions Digest, Vol 134, Issue 7 >>> ***************************************** >>> >> > _______________________________________________ > questions mailing list > questions@lists.ntp.org > http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions -- Oracle <http://www.oracle.com> Brian Utterback | Principle Software Engineer Phone: +1 6038973049 <tel:+1%206038973049> Oracle Systems/RPE Solaris Network 1 Oracle Dr. | Nashua, NH 03062 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ All working systems eventually start to exhibit their own agenda ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Green Oracle <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
