Hello,

We are currently making lots of changes to Rcpp (see the open Rcpp mailing list if interested [1] in the details).

We are now using [2] R_PreserveObject and R_ReleaseObject to manage garbage collection instead of the PROTECT/UNPROTECT dance. This seems to work well, but I was wondering if there was documentation about it.

In particular, if we preserve the same SEXP twice (or more), should we implement some sort of reference counting ?

Reading the source (below, from memory.c) I think not, but some confirmation would help.

void R_PreserveObject(SEXP object)
{
    R_PreciousList = CONS(object, R_PreciousList);
}

static SEXP RecursiveRelease(SEXP object, SEXP list)
{
    if (!isNull(list)) {
        if (object == CAR(list))
            return CDR(list);
        else
            CDR(list) = RecursiveRelease(object, CDR(list));
    }
    return list;
}

void R_ReleaseObject(SEXP object)
{
    R_PreciousList =  RecursiveRelease(object, R_PreciousList);
}


I'd also be interested if there is some ideas on the relative efficiency of the preserve/release mechanism compared to PROTECT/UNPROTECT.

Thanks,

Romain

[1] http://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/pipermail/rcpp-devel/
[2] http://r-forge.r-project.org/plugins/scmsvn/viewcvs.php/pkg/src/RObject.cpp?rev=255&root=rcpp&view=markup

--
Romain Francois
Professional R Enthusiast
+33(0) 6 28 91 30 30
http://romainfrancois.blog.free.fr
|- http://tr.im/IW9B : C++ exceptions at the R level
|- http://tr.im/IlMh : CPP package: exposing C++ objects
`- http://tr.im/HlX9 : new package : bibtex

______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Reply via email to