OK, I admit. It will never win a beauty price, but I won't either so we go pretty well together.
Seriously, I am aware this is about the worst way to solve such a problem. But as I said, rewriting the class definitions wasn't an option any more. I'll definitely take your advice for the next project. Cheers Joris On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Steve Lianoglou <mailinglist.honey...@gmail.com> wrote: > Howdy, > My eyes start to gloss over on their first encounter of `substitute` > ... add enough `eval`s and (even) an `expression` (!) to that, and > you'll probably see me running for the hills ... but hey, if it makes > sense to you, more power to you ;-) > > Glad you found a fix that works, > > -steve > > -- > Steve Lianoglou > Graduate Student: Computational Systems Biology > | Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center > | Weill Medical College of Cornell University > Contact Info: http://cbio.mskcc.org/~lianos/contact > -- Joris Meys Statistical consultant Ghent University Faculty of Bioscience Engineering Department of Applied mathematics, biometrics and process control tel : +32 9 264 59 87 joris.m...@ugent.be ------------------------------- Disclaimer : http://helpdesk.ugent.be/e-maildisclaimer.php ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
