Hi Daniel,
get() will work for any object, but cat() may not. cat() should work
for arrays, but it will be messy even for relatively small ones. For
example, run:
cat("Hello", array(1:100, dim = c(10, 10)), sep = " ")
What are you really trying to do? If you are just trying to figure
out what random variables in your workspace you've assigned but do not
know/forgot what they are, consider:
ls.str(pattern="^obj")
as a better way to get their names and some useful summaries
(including class and number of observations).
HTH,
Josh
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Daniel Weitzenfeld
<dweitzenf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> # Let's say I have 5 objects, object_1, object_2, etc.
> for (i in 1:5) {
> assign(paste("object_",i, sep=""), i+500)
> }
>
> # Now, for whatever reason, I don't know the names of the objects I've
> created, but I want to operate on them.
> list<-ls(pattern="^obj")
>
> #Is get best?
> for (l in list) {
> cat("\n", l, "is", get(l), sep=" ")
> }
>
> Is get() the correct command to use in this situation? What if rather than
> just an integer, object_1 etc are large arrays - does that change the
> answer, for speed reasons?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Dan
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
--
Joshua Wiley
Ph.D. Student, Health Psychology
University of California, Los Angeles
http://www.joshuawiley.com/
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
