Yihui Xie-2 wrote: > > > Currently Sweave does not format the (especially numeric) value in > \Sexpr{}, and I often have to round() the numbers explicitly, > otherwise I will get more than 10 digits, which is not necessary for > me in most cases. Is there a way to specify the number of digits to be > kept for values in \Sexpr{}? e.g. can we make \Sexpr{} respect > getOption('digits')? > >
Currently, Sweave does an eval on Sexpr, and that can be anything other than a number (is mostly is, though). And you cannot define a new version of Sexpr in latex, because Sexpr only looks like latex, but is processed before texing. My solution is to always do the rounding and formating in the R chunk (e.g. with latexSN of Hmisc) to unclutter the Sexpr. Dieter -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/a-rounding-option-for-Sexpr-tp3049872p3050001.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.