On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Den Alpin <den.al...@gmail.com> wrote: > I did some tests on Your and Gabor solutions, below my findings: > > - Your solution is fast as my solution in xts (below) but MUCH MORE > READABLE, in particular I think your test should take into account xts > creation from the data.frame (see below); > - Gabor's solution with read.zoo is fast as xts but give an xts object > that has some problems with time zones.
read.zoo gives a zoo object, not an xts object. If you want an xts object try as.xts(z). If you were expecting an xts object that may be the source of your other problems. -- Statistics & Software Consulting GKX Group, GKX Associates Inc. tel: 1-877-GKX-GROUP email: ggrothendieck at gmail.com ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
