You may want to check how your loop "misses out" the zero:
C <- 5
for (i in 0:C) print(i)
## gives me
[1] 0
[1] 1
[1] 2
[1] 3
[1] 4
[1] 5
Regards,
Enrico
Am 12.12.2011 12:44, schrieb Thomas Chesney:
I would like to run a for loop with an index going from 0 to 499 but the
following seems to miss out the first value:
C<- 499
for (i in 0:C)
The alternative is:
C<- 500
for (i in 1:C)
{
#Then every time I use i, I replace it with i-1
}
Is this a good way to do it or is tere a better way?
Thank you,
ThomasThis message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and
may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in
error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not
use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any
attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not
necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
--
Enrico Schumann
Lucerne, Switzerland
http://nmof.net/
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
