I have not read it yet, but the acknowledgements at the end of the paper note that:
1. It was supported by an NSF grant. 2. At least two members of R Core are recognized amongst the list of names. Regards, Marc Schwartz On Apr 25, 2012, at 1:07 PM, Thomas Adams wrote: > Hmmm∑ an 'objective' assessment? Maybe. But it looks to me that some > commercial enterprise paid for this study as a means to argue against the > use of R in favor of a commercial package∑ > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:48 PM, R. Michael Weylandt < > michael.weyla...@gmail.com> <michael.weyla...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> http://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/jv/pubs/ecoop12.pdf >> >> A new paper out on R the language -- I'm not all the way through it but >> it's been an interesting read so far. Thought it might be of interest to >> the list. >> >> Michael Weylandt >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
