On 12/12/2015 8:44 AM, peter dalgaard wrote:
On 12 Dec 2015, at 10:54 , Martin Maechler <maech...@stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote:
My conclusion: Breaking such a fundamental lemma of logic as
"the empty set is always true"
Umm, that doesn't make sense to me. Surely you mean that "an AND-operation over an
empty index set is TRUE"? A similar OR operation is FALSE, i.e. they behave like
empty products and sums, respectively.
How about "the empty set is all true, and all false."
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
