Look more carefully at y. If this is a factor, please note what is the
first (reference) level and what the second. This determines the rule,
not the value of the first observation.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 02.05.2017 07:25, Daniel Jeske wrote:
Hello -
I have noticed that when I run svm() the order of my data matters. If the
first case in the data frame has y=+1 I get the expected decision rule that
says to classify as +1 if f(x)>0. However, if the first case in the data
frame has y=-1 then apparently the decision rule being used says to
classify as +1 if f(x)<0, and in this case all the coefficients are
negative of their values compared to the first case. So the two
classification rules are equivalent, but is a user really supposed to know
the difference? It is likely they would assume the decision rule is always
to classify as +1 if f(x)>0. Does anyone think the behavior I have noticed
is as intended, or is otherwise benign?
Thank you,
Daniel Jeske
Professor
Department of Statistics
University of California - Riverside
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
