R is not a very good macro language... I recommend against this strategy. We could be more concrete in offering alternatives if you were a little more complete in your reproducible example [1][2][3]. What variations exactly were you thinking of? What kind of data are you working with? The way you read in the data can make a big difference in how effectively you analyze it. (Not asking for your actual data... just a fake version of it.)
[1] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5963269/how-to-make-a-great-r-reproducible-example [2] http://adv-r.had.co.nz/Reproducibility.html [3] https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/reprex/index.html -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. On June 12, 2017 6:55:40 PM PDT, Donald Macnaughton <don...@matstat.com> wrote: >I have the string ggstr that I've built with string manipulation: > >ggstr = "ggplot(df1, aes(x,y)) + geom_smooth(se=FALSE, span=0.01)" > >Assuming df1 is properly defined, this string will execute properly if >I >submit it manually without the quotes. How can execute the command as a >string, so that I can run it repeatedly (with minor modifications) in a >loop? Presumably, it would be something like: > >execute(ggstr) > >Thanks for your help, > >Don Macnaughton > >______________________________________________ >R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see >https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help >PLEASE do read the posting guide >http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html >and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.