Thank you to Bert, Sarah, and John. I did consider suppressing warnings, but I 
felt that there must be a more principled approach.  While John's solution is 
what I would prefer, I cannot help but wonder why `ifelse' was not constructed 
to avoid this behavior.

Thanks & Best regards,
Ravi
________________________________
From: John Fox <j...@mcmaster.ca>
Sent: Thursday, October 7, 2021 2:00 PM
To: Ravi Varadhan <ravi.varad...@jhu.edu>
Cc: R-Help <r-help@r-project.org>
Subject: Re: [R] How to use ifelse without invoking warnings


      External Email - Use Caution



Dear Ravi,

It's already been suggested that you could disable warnings, but that's
risky in case there's a warning that you didn't anticipate. Here's a
different approach:

 > kk <- k[k >= -1 & k <= n]
 > ans <- numeric(length(k))
 > ans[k > n] <- 1
 > ans[k >= -1 & k <= n] <- pbeta(p, kk + 1, n - kk, lower.tail=FALSE)
 > ans
[1] 0.000000000 0.006821826 0.254991551 1.000000000

BTW, I don't think that you mentioned that p = 0.3, but that seems
apparent from the output you showed.

I hope this helps,
  John

--
John Fox, Professor Emeritus
McMaster University
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
web: 
https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsocialsciences.mcmaster.ca%2Fjfox%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cravi.varadhan%40jhu.edu%7Cfd882e7c4f4349db34e108d989bc6a9f%7C9fa4f438b1e6473b803f86f8aedf0dec%7C0%7C0%7C637692265160038474%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&amp;sdata=Q33yXm36BwEVKUWO72CWFpSUx7gcEEXhM3qFi7n78ZM%3D&amp;reserved=0

On 2021-10-07 12:29 p.m., Ravi Varadhan via R-help wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to execute the following vectorized calculation:
>
>    ans <- ifelse (k >= -1 & k <= n, pbeta(p, k+1, n-k, lower.tail = FALSE), 
> ifelse (k < -1, 0, 1) )
>
> For example:
>
>
>> k <- c(-1.2,-0.5, 1.5, 10.4)
>> n <- 10
>> ans <- ifelse (k >= -1 & k <= n, pbeta(p,k+1,n-k,lower.tail=FALSE), ifelse 
>> (k < -1, 0, 1) )
> Warning message:
> In pbeta(p, k + 1, n - k, lower.tail = FALSE) : NaNs produced
>> print(ans)
> [1] 0.000000000 0.006821826 0.254991551 1.000000000
>
> The answer is correct.  However, I would like to eliminate the annoying 
> warnings.  Is there a better way to do this?
>
> Thank you,
> Ravi
>
>
>       [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstat.ethz.ch%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fr-help&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cravi.varadhan%40jhu.edu%7Cfd882e7c4f4349db34e108d989bc6a9f%7C9fa4f438b1e6473b803f86f8aedf0dec%7C0%7C0%7C637692265160048428%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&amp;sdata=FXX%2B4zNT0JHBnDFO5dXBDQ484oQF1EK5%2Fa0dG9P%2F4k4%3D&amp;reserved=0
> PLEASE do read the posting guide 
> https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.r-project.org%2Fposting-guide.html&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cravi.varadhan%40jhu.edu%7Cfd882e7c4f4349db34e108d989bc6a9f%7C9fa4f438b1e6473b803f86f8aedf0dec%7C0%7C0%7C637692265160048428%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&amp;sdata=ss2ohzJIY6qj0eAexk4yVzTzbjXxK5VZNors0GpsbA0%3D&amp;reserved=0
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>


        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to