That's not the catch, the catch is that there is no editorial "control" (for the lack of a better word) or quality control, which allows every nincompoop to write "authoritative" knols as evidenced on the web site. I am also quite sure that they place and check cookies to increase their knowledge about users, like they do with all their other web sites and chrome. (Not that it bothers me much, personally...)
In any case, your elderly gynaecologist would like to be able to look up the answers to fundamental before bothering the experts... greetings, el on 9/29/08 9:50 AM Ajay ohri said the following: > However wikis are a bit outdated. The latest is knol.google.com as it gives > you the right to make document editable, or allow comments, or even what > kind of license you want content to be shared. The catch again is its owned > by Google , the big company. ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
