On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Moshe Olshansky<m_olshan...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Make it > for (i in 1:9) Thanks. That's also how I solved the problem myself. I just somehow think it makes my code look rather clumsy and opaque. Maybe I just have to get used to this kind of nasty tricks. > This is not the general solution, (...) What do you mean? It looks a like a very general solution to me. -- Michael Knudsen micknud...@gmail.com http://lifeofknudsen.blogspot.com/ ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
