Le mercredi 07 avril 2010 à 18:03 +1000, William Venables a écrit : [ Snip ... ]
> [ ... ] The effect is > somewhat like that of the use of the .Data directory in S-PLUS, (a > program not unlike R), though somewhat more manually driven. I'm not sure that such "old-timers" puns qualify for fortune()ification, but this is a good one... William : did you consider possible interaction with other cacheing efforts such as cachesweave ? It seems that the idea of alleviating memory/CPU time requirements is a concern to many people (of course, the intrinsically interactive development process that S/R allow(s) makes this a big concern). Unifying those efforts, and maybe incorporating them in the base interpreter, might be worthwhile... ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
