Note this behaviour: > a<-"a" > a<-NA > mode(a) [1] "logical" > a<-"a" > is.na(a) <- T > mode(a) [1] "character"
However after either way of assigning NA to a, is.na(a) is true, and it prints as NA, so I can't see it's ever likely to matter. [Why do I say these things? Expect usual flood of examples where it does matter.] Also if a is a character vector, a[2] <- NA coerces the NA to as.character(NA); again, just as one would hope/expect. I have to echo Richard O'K's remark: if <- NA can ever go wrong, is that not a bug rather than a feature? Simon Fear Senior Statistician Syne qua non Ltd Tel: +44 (0) 1379 644449 Fax: +44 (0) 1379 644445 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.synequanon.com Number of attachments included with this message: 0 This message (and any associated files) is confidential and\...{{dropped}} ______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
