A Google search showed that all this was discussed in April 1988 with an extensive reply to the question from M Maechler.
Sorry above should be 1998


On 2 Mar 2004, at 10:18, Christoph Scherber wrote:

Dear colleagues,

I think it would be a good idea to include a short note in the R boxplot() help file, stating exactly how the confidence levels are calculated
("the notches are +/- 1.58 IQR/sqrt(n)") - at least as a guidance for users not advanced enough to directly interpret the code.


Would this be possible?

Regards,
Christoph.

David James wrote:

Prof Brian Ripley wrote:

On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Martin Maechler wrote:

"TL" == Thomas Lumley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
on Mon, 1 Mar 2004 09:54:48 -0800 (PST) writes:

TL> On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Christoph Scherber wrote:
>> Dear list members,
>>
>> Can anyone tell me how the notches in boxplot(Y~X,notch=T) are
>> calculated? What do these notches represent exactly? I´d suppose they
>> are Conficence Intervals for the median, but I´ve also been told they
>> might show Least Significant Difference (LSD) equivalents.


TL> The help page says that
TL> " If the notches of two plots do not overlap then
TL> the medians are significantly different at the 5 percent level."

TL> The only thing wrong with this is that it isn't true.
TL> The code says that the notches are +/- 1.58 IQR/sqrt(n),
TL> so I think the claimed confidence level holds only for
TL> normal distribuitons with small amounts of contamination.

I think John Tukey's idea was that this formula (or just the fact of
using median and quartiles) is still often approximately correct
for quite a few kinds of moderate contaminations...

It may be approximately correct for the width of a CI (and when I checked
it was only appproximately correct for a normal), but I would seriously
doubt if it were approximately correct for a significance level of 5%.
Remember how fast the tails of the asymptotic normal distribution decay: a
20% error turns 5% into 2%.


BTW, if there is a precise reference for this it would be good to add it
to boxplot.stats.Rd, as the confidence limits are unexplained there.


@article{McGi:Tuke:Lars:1978,
author = {McGill, Robert and Tukey, John W. and Larsen, Wayne A.},
title = {Variations of {B}ox plots},
year = {1978},
journal = {The American Statistician},
volume = {32},
pages = {12--16},
keywords = {Exploratory data analysis; Graphics}
}

@book{Cham:Clev:Klei:Tuke:1983,
author = {Chambers, John M. and Cleveland, William S. and Kleiner, Beat
and Tukey, Paul A.},
title = {Graphical methods for data analysis},
year = {1983},
pages = {395},
publisher = {Wadsworth Publishing Co Inc}
}


--
Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595

______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html



______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html



P. B. Pynsent,
Research & Teaching Centre,
Royal Orthopaedic Hospital,
Northfield,
Birmingham, B31 2AP,
U. K.

______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html

Reply via email to