On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:59:58 -0700, "Vadim Ogranovich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> R's IO is indeed 20 - 50 times slower than that of equivalent C code no >matter what you do, which has been a pain for some of us. Things like this shouldn't be a pain for long. If C code works well, why not use C? It wouldn't be hard to write two C functions that 1. counted the lines and 2. read them into preallocated vectors. Doing it this way you could use .C, you don't need to learn the intricacies of .Call, and it should be about half the speed (since it takes two passes) of fast C code, i.e. 10-25 times faster than the read.* functions. Then, if you felt really ambitious, you could write it in a way that others could use, put it in a package, and suddenly R would have I/O 10-25 times faster than it does now. You wouldn't try to make it as flexible as current R code, but for reading these huge files people are talking about, it would be worthwhile to go through a few extra setup steps. Duncan Murdoch ______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
