G'day John,
>>>>> "JT" == Thaden, John J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JT> Isn't is standard practice to have R base functions accept
JT> truncated argument names as long as they are unambiguous?
No. :)
The help page of order states:
Usage:
order(..., na.last = TRUE, decreasing = FALSE)
Standard practice in R is that arguments behind ... are only matched
by "exact matching", i.e., you have to specify the tag of that
argument in full. Details on how arguments are matched are in the
section "Argument matching" of "The R Language Definition" (and all
though this is a draft, that part seems to be authoritative :) ).
Cheers,
Berwin
========================== Full address ============================
Berwin A Turlach Tel.: +61 (8) 6488 3338 (secr)
School of Mathematics and Statistics +61 (8) 6488 3383 (self)
The University of Western Australia FAX : +61 (8) 6488 1028
35 Stirling Highway
Crawley WA 6009 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Australia http://www.maths.uwa.edu.au/~berwin
______________________________________________
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
