On 01-Aug-07 19:18:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Well, is "t = 1.11" all that accurate in the first place? :-) > > In fact, reading beween the lines of the original enquiry, what the > person probably wanted was something like > > ta <- pt(-1.11, 9) + pt(1.11, 9, lower.tail = FALSE) > > which is the two-sided t-test tail area. > > The teller of the parable will usually leave some things unexplained... > > Bill.
However: "Those who have ears to hear, let them hear!" Ted. -------------------------------------------------------------------- E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861 Date: 01-Aug-07 Time: 20:43:53 ------------------------------ XFMail ------------------------------ ______________________________________________ R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
