Many thanks, Emmanuel,
Setting the number of nodes to 9 solved the problem.
Cheers
Agus
2012/5/25 Agus Camacho <agus.cama...@gmail.com>

> Thanks emmanuel,
>
> Got this:
>
>  tree$node.label [1]  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 10> tree$Nnode[1] 9
>
>
> Wonder how is that possible. So im sending how i generated the tree.
> tree <- read.tree(text="
> ((((C.leiolepis:0.0168, C.nicterus:0.0099):0.0242
> ,C.sinebrachiatus:0.024):0.074
> ,(S.catimbau:0.0652,N.ablephara:0.0309):0.0648):0.0659
>
> ,((((P.erythrocercus:0.0235,P.tetradactylus:0.0259):0.0462
> ,V.rubricauda:0.124):0.0225
> ,M.maximiliani:0.0615):0.0828
> ,P.paeminosus:0.1093):0.0131);")
>
> tree$node.label=c(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10)
> plot(tree,show.node.label=TRUE,use.edge.length=TRUE)
>
>
>
> 2012/5/24 Emmanuel Paradis <emmanuel.para...@ird.fr>
>
>> Hi Agus,
>>
>> It seems the problem comes when pic() tries to create names to the
>> contrasts. Probably your tree has badly formatted node labels. What do the
>> following commands return?
>>
>> tree$node.label
>> tree$Nnode
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Emmanuel
>>
>> Agus Camacho wrote on 25/05/2012 01:58:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> When calculating independent contrasts of a variable, I get the following
>>> message:
>>>
>>>  ContrastWeight<- pic(Weight,tree)Error en names(contr)<- lbls :
>>>>
>>>   el atributo 'names' [10] debe tener la misma longitud que el vector [9]
>>> The attribute "names" [10] must have the same length than the vector[9]
>>> (this was translated by me)
>>>
>>> After checking the help on the command, i made the following
>>>
>>> observations,
>>>  >  length(Weight)[1] 10>  class(Weight)[1] "numeric">  tree$tip.label
>>> [1] "C.leiolepis"      "C.nicterus"       "C.sinebrachiatus"
>>>  [4] "S.catimbau"       "N.ablephara"      "P.erythrocercus"
>>>  [7] "P.tetradactylus"  "V.rubricauda"     "M.maximiliani"
>>> [10] "P.paeminosus">  class(tree)[1] "phylo"
>>>
>>>  Weight     C.leiolepis       C.nicterus C.sinebrachiatus
>>>> S.catimbau
>>>>
>>>        0.9020000        0.7155556        0.5370526        0.5887500
>>>      N.ablephara  P.erythrocercus  P.tetradactylus     V.rubricauda
>>>        0.5460000        0.4127273        0.3970000        0.4725294
>>>    M.maximiliani     P.paeminosus
>>>        0.4833333        0.4677692
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> However, to me, everything seems to be right about the names and the
>>> vector's length. Any hint?
>>>
>>> Thanks to all. I am new to these analyses and appreciate much the help
>>> from the mail list.
>>>
>>>
>>> Agus
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> R-sig-phylo mailing list
>>> R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/**listinfo/r-sig-phylo<https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Emmanuel Paradis
>> IRD, Jakarta, Indonesia
>> http://ape.mpl.ird.fr/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Agustín Camacho Guerrero.
> Doutorando em Zoologia.
> Laboratório de Herpetologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de
> Biociências, USP.
> Rua do Matão, trav. 14, nº 321, Cidade Universitária,
> São Paulo - SP, CEP: 05508-090, Brasil.
>
>


-- 
Agustín Camacho Guerrero.
Doutorando em Zoologia.
Laboratório de Herpetologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de
Biociências, USP.
Rua do Matão, trav. 14, nº 321, Cidade Universitária,
São Paulo - SP, CEP: 05508-090, Brasil.

        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

_______________________________________________
R-sig-phylo mailing list
R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo

Reply via email to