Quick correction: index variables are transformed into n x (k - 1) matrices
of INDICATOR variables.

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Peter Smits <psm...@uchicago.edu> wrote:

> Hi Will,
>
> Quick answer to that question: yes.
>
> The key is that categorical variables cannot be modeled directly in a GLM
> framework. These categorical variables, or index variables, are transformed
> into n x (k - 1) matrices of index variables. These index variables are
> binary where a 1 corresponds to the observed having that state. K is the
> number of states in the index variable. Only k - 1 columns are necessary
> because the intercept of the model corresponds to the remaining state. The
> interpretation of the beta coefficients for each of the (k - 1) predictors
> are then their contrast to or difference between that state and the state
> "held" by the intercept.
>
> R will do this silently when you fit the model.
>
> If all k states are included while also including an intercept term, the
> model becomes unidentifiable because you've effectively included two
> intercept terms which are additively non-identifiable.
>
> I hope that makes sense.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Peter
>
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 5:20 PM, William Gearty <wgea...@stanford.edu>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Liam,
>>
>> Thanks for the help!
>> Does this type of linear model work if X1 and X2 are categorical
>> variables?
>>
>> -Will
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Liam J. Revell <liam.rev...@umb.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi William.
>> >
>> > You should be able to fit this kind of model using gls in the nlme
>> > package. In your case, this would look something like:
>> >
>> > library(ape)
>> > library(nlme)
>> > fit<-gls(Y~X1*X2,data,correlation=corBrownian(1,tree))
>> > anova(fit)
>> >
>> > for instance. This is just a linear model with multiple predictors and
>> > residual error that is correlated according to the phylogeny.
>> >
>> > If you search R-sig-phylo for gls and/or nlme, or search the web for GLS
>> > and phylogenies, you should be able to find out more info.
>> >
>> > All the best, Liam
>> >
>> > Liam J. Revell, Assistant Professor of Biology
>> > University of Massachusetts Boston
>> > web: http://faculty.umb.edu/liam.revell/
>> > email: liam.rev...@umb.edu
>> > blog: http://blog.phytools.org
>> >
>> >
>> > On 2/4/2015 5:38 PM, William Gearty wrote:
>> >
>> >> Apologies if this has been asked before...
>> >> I'm trying to perform a phylogenetic ANOVA with multiple predictors.
>> >> I'm able to do a normal ANOVA with multiple predictors like this:
>> >>
>> >>  aov(Y ~ X1 * X2, data)
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> However, I'd like to account for phylogenetic relatedness and tried
>> doing
>> >> something similar with aov.phylo:
>> >>
>> >>    aov(Y ~ X1 * X2, phy)
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> However, the function yells at me:
>> >>
>> >>  'formula' must be of the form 'dat~group', where 'group' is a named
>> >>> factor
>> >>> vector and 'dat' is a data matrix or named vector
>> >>>
>> >>>  Therefore, it seems like aov.phylo is not built to perform a
>> >> multi-predictor analysis like the normal aov function is.
>> >> Are there any similar functions that would be able pull this off? Is
>> there
>> >> way around this with aov.phylo?
>> >> Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated,
>> >> Will
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>> --
>> William Gearty
>> PhD Student, Paleobiology
>> Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences
>> Stanford School of Earth Sciences
>> people.stanford.edu/wgearty
>>
>>         [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> R-sig-phylo mailing list - R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo
>> Searchable archive at
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/r-sig-phylo@r-project.org/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Peter D Smits
> Grad student
> Committee on Evolutionary Biology
> University of Chicago
> psm...@uchicago.edu
> http://home.uchicago.edu/~psmits/home.html
>



-- 
Peter D Smits
Grad student
Committee on Evolutionary Biology
University of Chicago
psm...@uchicago.edu
http://home.uchicago.edu/~psmits/home.html

        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

_______________________________________________
R-sig-phylo mailing list - R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo
Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/r-sig-phylo@r-project.org/

Reply via email to