Hi Everyone,
I have a dataset I'm running PhyloGLMs on with 100 trees. My code stores
the results for each tree in a nested list such that the list has 100
elements, 1 for each tree. I am wondering the best way to report my
results for these phyloGLMs given there's 100 results? Is averaging all
the best results together the best practice? If so I am wondering the best
way to average the 100 trees? I am interested in reporting the Estimate,
Std error, Z value, and P values. I do not see the std error, z value, or p
value explicitly labeled in the nested list (whereas coefficients are
labeled in the list allowing me to pull them out and average them).
Normally I would use the summary() function to get the std error, z value,
and p value, but not sure how to get summary results across 100 trees?
Thanks,
Trevor
--
Trevor Bak
Tropical Conservation Biology and Environmental Science Master's Student
University of Hawaii, Hilo
200 W. Kawili St., Hilo, HI 96720
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________
R-sig-phylo mailing list - R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo
Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/r-sig-phylo@r-project.org/
