I'm fixing pr 15227 but I would like to do so in a backwards-incompatible way.
Right now an out-of-range index is sometimes allowed as an argument to in-vector, leading to the bug: $ racket Welcome to Racket v6.4.0.4. -> (for/sum ([x (in-vector (vector 10 20) 2 -1 -1)]) x) SIGSEGV MAPERR si_code 1 fault on addr 0x180 Aborted >From what I can tell, the out-of-range index is allowed to enable this program: (in-vector (vector) 0 0) I want to change in-vector so that the starting index is always a valid vector-ref. The above program would become illegal. >From what I gather, the above program is allowed so that in-vector mimics in-range but I don't think this makes sense either if it means allowing out-of-range indices for the former. Any objections? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
