> On Apr 21, 2016, at 7:46 AM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: > > At Wed, 20 Apr 2016 20:58:34 -0400, "'John Clements' via Racket Users" wrote: >> I feel like this must be a FAQ. I have a server process that I’m starting >> with >> process*, and I’d like to try to make sure that it gets killed when the >> “program halts.” (Presumably, this corresponds to process end at the >> command-line, or (more relevant to me) a click on “Run” in DrR, which AFAIK >> means “custodian-shutdown-all” on the user’s program’s custodian. > > Subprocesses in Racket have primitive support for termination on > custodian shutdown. See `current-subprocess-custodian-mode`. > > If subprocesses didn't have primitive custodian support, then there > would be no safe solution to your problem. Any kind of primitive > resource allocation, such as creating a subprocess, should have > custodian support built in primitively, too.
That works beautifully. Thanks! John Clements -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
