Ah, okay. Well maybe try the Haskell or OCaml versions of the 99 problems?

https://wiki.haskell.org/H-99:_Ninety-Nine_Haskell_Problems
https://ocaml.org/learn/tutorials/99problems.html


On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 3:28 AM, Daniel Prager <daniel.a.pra...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Ben
>
> I wrote:
>
>> Do you have an alternative recommendation in mind?
>
>
> At that point I was asking whether Sam (or others) recommended another set
> of problems more conducive to learning Typed Racket than the 99 Lisp
> Problems which Sam said were a tricky place to start.
>
> I can see that staying clear of macros avoids an additional layer of
> sophistication.
>
> Dan
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Ben Greenman <benjaminlgreen...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 12:46 AM, Daniel Prager <
>> daniel.a.pra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Do you have an alternative recommendation in mind?
>>
>>
>> I guess you already solved this one, but for later it might help to avoid
>> macros.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Daniel Prager*
> Agile/Lean Coaching, Innovation, and Leadership
> Profile: skillfire.co/dan
> Startups: youpatch.com <http://www.youpatch.com>, skillfire.co
> Twitter: @agilejitsu <https://twitter.com/agilejitsu>
> Blog: agile-jitsu.blogspot.com
> Linkedin: au.linkedin.com/in/danielaprager
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to