Your quastion is not clear to me but may be you want --thunk*--? Jos _____
From: racket-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:racket-users@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of David Storrs Sent: sábado, 12 de noviembre de 2016 22:23 To: Racket Users Subject: [racket-users] If a thunk is a proc of zero arguments, what is a proc of one argument? The 'thunk' procedure is really useful and is sprinkled liberally through my code because it saves keystrokes / is clearer than (lambda () ...). I often find myself writing (lambda (x) ...) for something and wishing that there was an equivalent of 'thunk' for that. Is there? If not, what would be a good name for it that I could use to create a macro for it? My current suggestion is 'thwonk', but I figured I'd bounce it off other people first. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
