Or up to 60, 60 even nowadays being a commonly used radix in time notation. Why restricting it to 36? Jos
-----Original Message----- From: racket-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:racket-users@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Dmitry Igrishin Sent: miércoles, 21 de diciembre de 2016 20:41 To: Racket Users Subject: [racket-users] Narrow radix of string->number. Hello, Why the radix of string->number is narrowed to (2 16)? Shouldn't it be (2 36)? There is a real need for it. Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
