> On Feb 8, 2017, at 9:05 PM, Philip McGrath <phi...@philipmcgrath.com> wrote:
> Personally, I tend to end up defining helper functions to do functional > update (often with optional keyword arguments to address the > fields-that-stay-the-same issue). Generics in the sense of racket/generic can > be helpful for this if using structs. I may then implement the helper > function using struct-copy, but I can hide away its idiosyncrasies. Thanks for the comments, Phillip. A helper method with keyword arguments might make my code more concise. Best regards, -Steve -- Steve Byan steveb...@me.com Littleton, MA -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
