Hi Andrew. Thanks, I do know about the here string syntax, and it's part of why 
I'm not willing to put much effort into fixing the lexer. :)

William, udelim is neat and may be useful for me, so thanks for mentioning it.

On Monday, May 1, 2017 at 6:48:12 PM UTC-4, Andrew Gwozdziewycz wrote:
> Hi Brendan,
> I'm wondering if you tried the here string syntax for your use case,
> which other than the fact that it requires a couple of newlines seems
> similar in vein to what you were going for (e.g. it doesn't escape
> anything)?

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to