> It would probably cause trouble iif we ever were to generalize to > dependent types.
Sure, but those same problems will be there anyway if the compile-time and run-time bindings live in separate namespaces and are allowed to bind the same identifier to different things, as is done in languages like Haskell. /David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
