I think the biggest thing is that no one has looked at optimizing
these benchmarks in Racket. If you tried out running one of these
benchmarks and ran the profiler it would probably show something
interesting.
Sam
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 6:43 AM hashim muqtadir
<hashim.muqta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> A new version of these benchmarks was just published ("Round 19"):
> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r19
>
> Racket scores rather poorly (0 errors is nice, though). Anybody has any
> guesses as to why this is? Racket performs well enough as far as I'm
> concerned, and while I don't use the web server much, sounds unlikely that it
> should be so far below django, for example. Maybe they run it in a
> handicapped configuration or something.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Racket Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/2a1062a4-e4f1-484c-a8a2-f63c161959e8%40googlegroups.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAK%3DHD%2BYJh96XAabvFRrW2HTFW9ECjKdnFOKomK0mdKeoA_4GNQ%40mail.gmail.com.
