nice, yes, I've long wanted that, in general. Like, I want to use
{erlang,ADA,haskell,typescript,go,...} but with s-expr's and macros.One could instead perhaps leverage Graal and things like ABCL or Clojure? You could in theory use something like XMLVM and Clojure to at least cover C#/.net and Java. (because another layer of indirection in a programming tool chain is never a problem, nope.) Or one could perhaps make a gcc s-expr front end https://superuser.com/a/1198792 and somehow leverage gcc's RTL to intermix-ffi with other languages? no idea. in this day and age i guess llvm is better? i'm a static typing lover, and some of the languages I'd like to see targeted are statically typed, so ideally it would be maybe something like TR supporting the target language type system, which probably is too much like square peg round hole -> unless one falls back to Xtend-esque approach which would compile to source code in Java/C# and then use the "native" compiler to type check. ??? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAJ7XQb6mJRtEeCEzk54rK8cQt2cTuregSGWg7Tfh4kLQQqcO4Q%40mail.gmail.com.
