On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 09:44:42 -0700 (PDT), Ryan Kramer <default.kra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> : >The other feature of let++ is that it also supports let-values. (Having to >nest "let, then let-values, then let again" was another reason my code >would get too indented for my taste.) > : Possibly a stupid question, but ... What causes you to /have to/ 'nest "let, then let-values, then let again"'? Assuming no intervening body code, a single let*-values could cover all of it (with the same semantics). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/pjd1ngddbcqpak5ke8720uddit5h254vmk%404ax.com.
