How about:
Someone Who Did Something
or
Person Who Did Something
of course that would eliminate non-human living entities. So, in order
not to be anthropomorphic, how about:
Being That Did Something
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Adam L. Schiff
Principal Cataloger
University of Washington Libraries
Box 352900
Seattle, WA 98195-2900
(206) 543-8409
(206) 685-8782 fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://faculty.washington.edu/~aschiff
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Jay Smith wrote:
Along those lines, and perhaps conforming to B. Eversberg's notion of
"involver", perhaps a slightly less loaded term (but admittedly not
entirely neutral!) would be: perpetrator. Abbreviated in relator codes
to: perp.
Jay Towne Smith
Senior Cataloger
San Francisco Public Library
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----Original Message-----
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of A. Ralph Papakhian
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 9:22 AM
To: RDA-L@INFOSERV.NLC-BNC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] "Author, author!" Re: [RDA-L] Fictitious characters
as authors
hi,
is mac suggesting "criminal defendants" as the single term?
now that's radical!
--r
A. Ralph Papakhian, Indiana University Music Library Bloomington, IN
47405 812/855-2970 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
co-owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't forget criminal defendants as 100's. We really haven't improved
on an ISBD unlabled display in my opinion.
J. McRee (Mac) Elrod, Special Libraries Cataloguing
