The term chosen was "Party".
So, the main entry would be the "party of the first part" and the added entries would be the "parties of the second part"? <wink> Which leads to the "primary party" and "secondary party" or ... "main party" and "added (or additional) parties". But getting serious again for a moment, I think Hal Cain's suggestion that a relator term or code always be included to better describe the relationship of the name to the resource being described, is something that we should seriously consider. Not only could OPACs use the term/code for display purposes, but FRBRization of catalog records could probably be much improved if a system knew that a particular name in one case was a translator and in another was an editor, illustrator, actor, soprano, defendant, etc. Adam ************************************** * Adam L. Schiff * * Principal Cataloger * * University of Washington Libraries * * Box 352900 * * Seattle, WA 98195-2900 * * (206) 543-8409 * * (206) 685-8782 fax * * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * **************************************
