Diane Thanks for this. This is just what I imagine when I think of applying RDA in some future environment that is no longer constrained by our legacy structures (pace Mac).
Just one suggestion and one question: In Scenario 2, while data from the ONIX record would be used to build, work, expression, and manifestation records, the ONIX record itself would be a manifestation record (like our existing bibliographic records) rather than a work record. In Scenario 3, would the link from the short story be to the manifestation record for the aggregate work--collected stories--or to the work record? Wouldn't the link occur at the level of the most abstract entity that was appropriate, i.e. the work level, since the component works in the collected stories would presumably remain constant through the levels of abstraction? Ed Jones National University (San Diego, Calif.) -----Original Message----- From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Diane I. Hillmann Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 2:19 PM To: RDA-L@INFOSERV.NLC-BNC.CA Subject: [RDA-L] Cataloger Scenarios added to wiki Folks: As part of the thinking we've been doing about the DCMI-RDA Task Group work, I've developed a couple of cataloger scenarios and added them to the DC-RDA TG wiki: http://www.dublincore.org/dcmirdataskgroup/Scenarios Please feel free to comment and make suggestions for improvement, and also send along some additional scenarios if you feel so moved. I can add them to the wiki, or, if you've put them someplace else, we can link to them. Unfortunately I can't really open the wiki up to more more editors (and truly, it's an old version of MoinMoin and has it's own issues, so you might not want to mess with it). Diane
