Can anyone explain why ISBD uses "electronic" and RDA uses "computer"? They have the same definition. Is this just an oversight?
kc J. McRee Elrod wrote:
>From IFLA: The members of the Materials Designations Study Group within the ISBD Review Group have completed the preparation of a draft of a proposed area 0 "Content Form and Media Type" together with examples. It is now posted on IFLANET and an invitation for worldwide review has been extended. Congratulations to the Material Designations Study Group and its chair Lynne Howarth and also to the ISBD Review Group chaired by Elena Escolano Rodriguez and many thanks for their hard work and dedication. The invitation to comment has background information, explanations, and a link to the PDF of the draft document. Please share this information with colleagues in your institutions and in your countries and encourage them to comment. The invitation is posted on IFLANET: http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/isbdrg/ISBD_Area_0_WWR.htm Please make comments before 30 January according to instructions in the invitation. Kind regards, Anders Cato Chair of the Standing Committee of the IFLA Cataloguing Section
-- ----------------------------------- Karen Coyle / Digital Library Consultant kco...@kcoyle.net http://www.kcoyle.net ph.: 510-540-7596 skype: kcoylenet fx.: 510-848-3913 mo.: 510-435-8234 ------------------------------------
