Mark said: >Wrong link?
Yes. Here 'tis: http://www.loc.gov/acq/conser/rda_examples-rev04-15-2009.pdf >The 588 field came out with the October 2009 MARC update. Add in the >60-day waiting period and you've got December/January as the >implementation date. The 500 source of description note is lacking from records for any genre except those for which we do such notes now. It will be interesting to see how widely 588 is applied. __ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca) {__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/ ___} |__ \__________________________________________________________
