First of all, I hope the title is spelled Jubilees in RDA.
Secondly, Esdras, 1st, is really the 3rd or 4th Esdras in the Apocrypha.
See authority record below:
n 80017836
040 DLC ǂb eng ǂc DLC ǂd DLC ǂd OCoLC ǂd UPB
130 0Bible. ǂp O.T. ǂp Apocrypha. ǂp Esdras, 1st
430 0Esdras (Book 1, Apocrypha)
430 0Esdras (Book 3)
430 0Esdras A
430 0Bible. ǂp Esdras, 3rd (Vulgate)
430 0Bible. ǂp Esdras A
430 0Bible. ǂp Esdras, 1st (Apocrypha)
430 0Bible. ǂp O.T. ǂp Esdras, 1st (Apocrypha)
430 0Bible. ǂp O.T. ǂp Esdras, 3rd (Vulgate)
430 0Bible. ǂp O.T. ǂp Esdras A
430 0Ėzdra (Book 3)
430 0Bible. ǂp O.T. ǂp Apocrypha. ǂp 1 Esdras ǂw nnaa
430 0Esdra (Book 3)
430 0Esra (Book 3)
430 0Bible. ǂp O.T. ǂp Esra III
430 0Bible. ǂp O.T. ǂp Esdra III
430 0Bible. ǂp O.T. ǂp Apocrypha. ǂp Esra III
430 0Bible. ǂp O.T. ǂp Apocrypha. ǂp Esdra III
667 Called Esdras 1 in the Greek Septuagint, Liber III Esdrae in Latin
Vulgate (2 Ezra in Ethiopic sources); begins: Kai ēgagen Iōseias to pascha
(Lat.: Et fecit Josias Pascha); original Greek?
670 Its A critical edition of ... 1929?
670 Bible. O.T. Apocrypha. Esdras, 1st. German. Wenzelsbibel. 1988. Esra
III, Tobias und Prediger, c1988: ǂb t.p. (Esra III) spine (Esra 3) running
title (Esdra III)
730 4Bible. ǂp Apocrypha. ǂp Esdras, 1st
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 11:14 AM, J. McRee Elrod <m...@slc.bc.ca> wrote:
> Jay Shorten asked:
>
> >Bible. Tobit
> >
> >or
> >
> >Bible. Apocrypha. Tobit?
>
>
> Nobody has actually answered Jay's question.
>
> My conclusion is the second example above.
>
> "Bible. Tobit" would be more in keeping with the treatment of other
> Biblical books.
>
> But as I read 6.23.2.6 (in the last text I saw), one would enter
> directly under the name of the book, with the Aprocypha as a whole
> inconsistently entered under Bible. Apocrypha, as opposed to
> Aprocrypha.
>
> 6.23.2.6 --> Overview
>
> Apocryphal Books
>
> Choose the title comonly found in sources in the language preferred by
> the agency creating the data as the preferred title for an apocryphal
> book (i.e., one included neither in the Catholic canon nor in the
> Protestant Apocrypha).
>
> For Example:
> Book of Joubilees
>
> For Example:
> Epistola Apostolorum
>
> For Example:
> Gospel According to the Hebrews
>
> BUT that contradicts 6.23.2.9.4 which says to further divide by the
> name of the book, and has the example:
>
> Bible. Aprocrapha. Esdras, 1st.
>
> The inversion and "1st" has me scratching my head.
>
> So Jay's question remains. With two rules in direct conflict, what
> does one do?
>
> I guess I would interpret 6.23.2.6 as telling me how to select the
> name for use in futher subdivison, as opposed to entry form, and go
> with:
>
> Bible. Apocrypha. Tobit. as I said above.
>
> But how do we know it's not "Book of Tobit"? I would have preferrd
> "Joubilees" to "Book of Joubilees" as in the first example.
>
> I suspect I will just look for an example in LC or LAC, and make no
> attempt interpret RDA rules. There just isn't enough time to do so,
> and remain economical.
>
>
> __ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca)
> {__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing
> HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/<http://www.slc.bc.ca/>
> ___} |__ \__________________________________________________________
>
--
Gene Fieg
Cataloger/Serials Librarian
Claremont School of Theology
gf...@cst.edu
