How about that old standby: Selections. And then use the cutter of the main work and add a "2" to it.
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Adam L. Schiff <asch...@u.washington.edu>wrote: > I have two publications with the same title proper, one of which is a > summary of the other: > > 245 00 Water availability in the Ovens : $b a report to the Australian > Government from the CSIRO Murray-Darling Basin Sustainable Yields Project. > 264 #1 [Clayton South, Victoria] : $b CSIRO, $c [2008] > 300 ## iii, 100 pages : $b color illustrations, color maps ; $c 30 cm. > > 245 00 Water availability in the Ovens : $b summary of a report to the > Australian Government from the CSIRO Murray-Darling Basin Sustainable > Yields Project. > 264 #1 [Clayton South, Victoria] : $b CSIRO, $c [2008] > 300 ## 11 pages : $b color illustrations, color maps ; $c 30 cm > > The question that I have is how best to distinguish between the source > work and the derivative work. On the record for the summary I could add > the following: > > 787 08 $i Summary of (work): $t Water availability in the Ovens > > but since the title is identical, this must have a qualifier of some sort, > yes? If so what would make a reasonable qualifier? The reciprocal > relationship would be: > > 787 08 $i Summary (work): $t Water availability in the Ovens > > Again, I think I need to break the conflict here by adding a qualifier. I > thought perhaps of using "(Summary)" but I've not seen this done in any > other situation. > > Just wondering what advice you might have about this sort of situation. > > Thanks, > > Adam Schiff > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^**^^^^^^^^ > Adam L. Schiff > Principal Cataloger > University of Washington Libraries > Box 352900 > Seattle, WA 98195-2900 > (206) 543-8409 > (206) 685-8782 fax > asch...@u.washington.edu > http://faculty.washington.edu/**~aschiff<http://faculty.washington.edu/~aschiff> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~**~~~~~~~~ > -- Gene Fieg Cataloger/Serials Librarian Claremont School of Theology gf...@cst.edu Claremont School of Theology and Claremont Lincoln University do not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information or content contained in this forwarded email. The forwarded email is that of the original sender and does not represent the views of Claremont School of Theology or Claremont Lincoln University. It has been forwarded as a courtesy for information only.
