If look at the examples from OCLC Bibliographic Formats and Standards,
yours is not correct.
‡3 Materials specified Information to differentiate the multiple statements
of the described materials to which the field applies. 260
Paris : ‡a New York :‡b Vogue ‡c 1964- 260 2
‡3 1980-May 1993 ‡a London :‡b Vogue 260 3
‡3 June 1993- ‡a London :‡b Elle 260 2
‡3 2000?-2002 ‡a New York :‡b Columbia University Press
Thanks,
Joan Wang
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Benjamin A Abrahamse <babra...@mit.edu>wrote:
> If we wanted to record a distributor (cf. RDA 21.4), and that
> distributor was only responsible for distribution in a particular
> geographic area, would we use 264 $3 ("materials specified")? ****
>
> ** **
>
> E.g.: Piscataway, NJ : $b Transactions Publishers, Rutgers University, $c
> [2012] $3 Copies distributed in North America****
>
> ** **
>
> This is not usually how "materials specified" is used but the current
> field definition seems to accommodate multiple, successive distributors
> with the first indicator, but not multiple synchronous distributors.****
>
> ** **
>
> --Ben****
>
> ** **
>
> Benjamin Abrahamse****
>
> Cataloging Coordinator****
>
> Acquisitions, Metadata and Enterprise Systems****
>
> MIT Libraries****
>
> 617-253-7137****
>
> ** **
>
--
Joan Wang
Cataloger -- CMC
Illinois Heartland Library System (Edwardsville Office)
6725 Goshen Road
Edwardsville, IL 62025
618.656.3216x409
618.656.9401Fax
