I haven't seen any responses to this question yet. Is there a 'correct'
answer or is it up to local preference?
On 11/27/2012 4:53 PM, Michael Cohen wrote:
RDA 2.4.1.5 allows for the omission of names performing the same
function, and instructs to "indicate the omission by summarizing what
has been omitted in the language and script preferred by the agency
preparing the description."
The example given is "Roger Colbourne [and six others]"
Some records in OCLC use the numerals rather than words, e.g. OCLC
#785874875 which has "[and 5 others]."
Is the use of words vs. numerals prescribed by RDA or PCC, or is this a
local decision based on preference of the agency?
--
________________________________________________________
Michael L. Cohen
Interim Head, Cataloging Department
General Library System
University of Wisconsin-Madison
324C Memorial Library
728 State Street
Madison, WI 53706-1494
Phone: (608) 262-3246 Fax: (608) 262-4861
Email: mco...@library.wisc.edu
