The implication of the instruction that all online resources are published
is that when making a record for the electronic thesis from the record for
the print manuscript, you'd need to change the type code to textual material
and supply a place of publication and publisher.
Adam
-----Original Message-----
From: Greta de Groat
Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2013 9:55 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RE : [RDA-L] "a" rather than "t" for ETD
Why would this be an exception to the P-N practice? I don't see it
addressed there as an exception. It seems to me that we have here two BIBCO
instructions that are in conflict (if you're not doing PCC cataloging, then
its not an issue).
Greta de Groat
Stanford University Libraries
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paradis Daniel" <daniel.para...@banq.qc.ca>
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2013 8:15:10 AM
Subject: [RDA-L] RE : [RDA-L] "a" rather than "t" for ETD
With the latest update to the RDA Toolkit, instruction 2.8.1.1 now includes
the sentence: Consider all online resources to be published.
Daniel Paradis
Bibliothécaire
Direction du traitement documentaire des collections patrimoniales
Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec
2275, rue Holt
Montréal (Québec) H2G 3H1
Téléphone : 514 873-1101, poste 3721
Télécopieur : 514 873-7296
daniel.para...@banq.qc.ca<mailto:daniel.para...@banq.qc.ca>
http://www.banq.qc.ca<http://www.banq.qc.ca/>
_____
De: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access de la
part de J. McRee Elrod
Date: ven. 2013-05-17 23:12
À: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Objet : Re: [RDA-L] "a" rather than "t" for ETD
Greta asked:
So, if we are supposed to be cataloging online monographs according to
Prov=
ider-neutral guidelines, wouldn't that mean that they would still be
catalo=
ged as unpublished?
If it is electronic, it is considered published.
J. McRee (Mac) Elrod
4493 Lindholm Road
Victoria BC V9C 3Y1 Canada
(250) 474-3361
m...@elrod.ca
