Karen Nelson <knel...@capilanou.ca> wrote: > But I am still wondering about the issue of the author holding copyright > … does her name go in the second 264, if a second one is kept? Haven’t seen > it done so far. >
The 264 field dedicated to copyright is for the date alone--that's it. So all you'll get is: - 264 -4 $c ©2013 See RDA 2.11 for the instructions, if you have a copy. If you want to get into the copyright weeds, there's the 542 field: http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd542.html -- Mark K. Ehlert Minitex <http://www.minitex.umn.edu/>
