I'm not sure it's a "voting" thing, but if it is, I support a new codebase since I suspect with the insight of the existing codebase a re-write wouldn't actually take anywhere near as long as the initial development, and would give the project a new beginning and the opportunity to add features that would be almost impossible with the old architecture. Many parts of the original code could possibly be re-used with minimal changes.
Having said that, I know in open source projects "votes" are proportional to the amount of development time you can put into it, and on that front I'm afraid other than mailing list rants and using the program, I haven't got the time to contribute significantly. _______________________________________________ rdiff-backup-users mailing list at rdiff-backup-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki
