Sorry, I mistakenly replied to just Colin before, rather than the whole
list.

I think the answer is that the outer ring is aromatic, but the two inner
rings, the 5-ring and the 6-ring, aren’t. This would mean that the bond
between 11 and 16 isn’t aromatic.
It is certainly true that the bond between 2 aromatic atoms can be
non-aromatic.  The bond between the two benzene rings in bi-phenyl would be
the classic example.

Cheers,
Dave


On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 10:25 AM Colin Bournez <colin.bour...@univ-orleans.fr>
wrote:

> Yes I know it's a tautomer, but I don't figure out how to handle it
> without returning to the other form.
> If I transform the SINGLE bond to AROMATIC, it can't be sanitized still
> returns 0 NAR....
>
> Colin
>
> On 06/03/19 11:11, Michal Krompiec wrote:
>
> It’s because the molecule with atom indices is a tautomer of the other one
> (H at the other N), hence different Kekule structure and different
> behaviour of the aromaticity perception code.
> Best,
> Michal
>
> On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 10:04, Colin Bournez <colin.bour...@univ-orleans.fr>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> Indeed it seems one bond is not tagged as aromatic.
>>
>> Here are the aromatics bond (begin atom, end atom) :
>>
>> 0 1
>> 1 19
>> 19 16
>> 11 14
>> 14 12
>> 12 7
>> 7 20
>> 11 0
>> 20 16
>>
>> We see that between the atom 11 and 16 it is not aromatic.
>> It is a single type:
>> 16 11 SINGLE
>>
>>
>> The problem remains after sanitizing the molecule and both atoms are tagged 
>> as aromatic.
>> A bond between two aromatic atoms can be single?
>>
>> On 06/03/19 10:49, Greg Landrum wrote:
>>
>> Hi Colin,
>> The aromatic ring counting code identifies rings where every *bond* is
>> aromatic, so I guess one or more bonds in the rings of the first molecule
>> are not aromatic.
>> Could it be that you haven't sanitized the molecule before calculating
>> descriptors?
>> -greg
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 6:00 PM Colin Bournez <
>> <colin.bour...@univ-orleans.fr>colin.bour...@univ-orleans.fr> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear all, I might have encountered a little problem concerning the
>>> function rdMolDescriptors.CalcNumAromaticRings(). For this molecule shown
>>> with index:
>>>
>>> Here is what I do :
>>>
>>> So I have as expected my aromatic atoms but when I ask for aromatic Rings 
>>> it returns 0 instead of two.
>>> Anyone has an idea?
>>>
>>> For information if the molecule is in that form
>>> It returns 2 NAR as expected.
>>>
>>> Colin
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Bournez Colin * <https://www.linkedin.com/in/colin-bournez-b9a1b2b7/>
>>>  <http://www.icoa.fr/> *Chemoinformatics PhD Student *
>>> * Institute of Organic and Analytical Chemistry (ICOA UMR7311)*
>>>  Université d'Orléans - Pôle de Chimie  Rue de Chartres - BP 6759  45067
>>> Orléans Cedex 2 - France  +33 (0)2 38 49 45 77
>>> <+33%202%2038%2049%2045%2077>  SBC Tool Platform <http://sbc.icoa.fr/>
>>> - SBC Team <http://www.icoa.fr/bonnet>  <http://www.icoa.fr/fr/rss.xml>
>>>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/pages/Institut-de-Chimie-Organique-et-Analytique-ICOA-umr7311/222060911297163>
>>>  <https://twitter.com/ICOA_UMR7311>
>>>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/institut-de-chimie-organique-et-analytique---icoa-umr7311/>
>>> _______________________________________________ Rdkit-discuss mailing
>>> list Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss
>>
>> --
>> *Bournez Colin * <https://www.linkedin.com/in/colin-bournez-b9a1b2b7/> 
>> <http://www.icoa.fr/> *Chemoinformatics PhD Student *
>> * Institute of Organic and Analytical Chemistry (ICOA UMR7311)*
>>  Université d'Orléans - Pôle de Chimie  Rue de Chartres - BP 6759  45067
>> Orléans Cedex 2 - France  +33 (0)2 38 49 45 77
>> <+33%202%2038%2049%2045%2077>  SBC Tool Platform <http://sbc.icoa.fr/> - SBC
>> Team <http://www.icoa.fr/bonnet>  <http://www.icoa.fr/fr/rss.xml>
>>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/pages/Institut-de-Chimie-Organique-et-Analytique-ICOA-umr7311/222060911297163>
>>  <https://twitter.com/ICOA_UMR7311>
>>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/institut-de-chimie-organique-et-analytique---icoa-umr7311/>
>> _______________________________________________ Rdkit-discuss mailing
>> list Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss
>
> --
> *Bournez Colin * <https://www.linkedin.com/in/colin-bournez-b9a1b2b7/> 
> <http://www.icoa.fr/> *Chemoinformatics PhD Student *
> * Institute of Organic and Analytical Chemistry (ICOA UMR7311)*
>  Université d'Orléans - Pôle de Chimie  Rue de Chartres - BP 6759  45067
> Orléans Cedex 2 - France  +33 (0)2 38 49 45 77
> <+33%202%2038%2049%2045%2077>  SBC Tool Platform <http://sbc.icoa.fr/> - SBC
> Team <http://www.icoa.fr/bonnet>  <http://www.icoa.fr/fr/rss.xml>
>
> <https://www.facebook.com/pages/Institut-de-Chimie-Organique-et-Analytique-ICOA-umr7311/222060911297163>
>  <https://twitter.com/ICOA_UMR7311>
>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/institut-de-chimie-organique-et-analytique---icoa-umr7311/>
> _______________________________________________
> Rdkit-discuss mailing list
> Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss
>


-- 
David Cosgrove
Freelance computational chemistry and chemoinformatics developer
http://cozchemix.co.uk
_______________________________________________
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss

Reply via email to