Hi Greg,

The problem seems to happen whether running in a single thread or not.
It does not seem to depend on the molecule. Seems to always happen AFAICT.
The molecules are created from SMILES using RWMol.MolFromSmiles(smiles),
which I believe sanatizes by default.

Tim

On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 12:36 PM Greg Landrum <greg.land...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Tim,
>
> I haven't seen this particular problem myself, nor have we gotten any
> reports of crashes from the Morgan fingerprinting code.
> Comparing the fingerprinting code itself across the 2019.09 and 2020.09
> branches I also don't see anything which is likely to cause problems, but
> one never knows.
>
> One thing that might help to know is how you construct the molecule's
> you're generating fingerprints for: are these from one of the RDKit file
> parsers? Have they been sanitized?
>
> Another thing you might have already tried, but it's worth checking
> anyway: can you force your web app to only run a single thread at a time?
> That shouldn't be a problem with the morgan fingerprinting code, but it's
> still worth the experiment.
>
> -greg
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 7:14 PM Tim Dudgeon <tdudgeon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Wondering if anyone had any thoughts on this core dump from Java.
>> What other info would be useful?
>>
>> Tim
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 12:55 PM Tim Dudgeon <tdudgeon...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm struggling to work out a stange core dump I'm getting when
>>> calculating Morgan fingerprints from Java. This seems to happen with the
>>> Release_2020_09 releases but not with the Release_2019_09 ones. It does not
>>> happen when calculating RDKit fingerprints. The exact Java code involved is:
>>>
>>> RDKFuncs.MorganFingerprintMol(mol, 2);
>>>
>>> More precisely this is happening when running inside a Docker container
>>> which is running the code as a Tomcat webapp, but a simple test of running
>>> that same function inside the container directly from Java (e.g. not when
>>> running in tomcat) works OK and does not core dump.
>>> Building an otherwise identical container with the Release_2019_09 code
>>> does not core dump from Tomcat.
>>>
>>> The core dump looks like this:
>>>
>>> # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
>>> #
>>> #  SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x00007ff9edc00518, pid=1, tid=111
>>> #
>>> # JRE version: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (11.0.9.1+1) (build
>>> 11.0.9.1+1-post-Debian-1deb10u2)
>>> # Java VM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (11.0.9.1+1-post-Debian-1deb10u2,
>>> mixed mode, sharing, tiered, compressed oops, g1 gc, linux-amd64)
>>> # Problematic frame:
>>> # [thread 145 also had an error]
>>> [thread 149 also had an error]
>>> [thread 113 also had an error]
>>> [thread 117 also had an error]
>>> C  [libGraphMolWrap.so+0xa20518]  void
>>> RDKit::MorganFingerprints::calcFingerprint<RDKit::SparseIntVect<unsigned
>>> int> >(RDKit::ROMol const&, unsigned int, std::vector<unsigned int,
>>> std::allocator<unsigned int> >*, std::vector<unsigned int,
>>> std::allocator<unsigned int> > const*, bool, bool, bool, bool,
>>> std::map<unsigned int, std::vector<std::pair<unsigned int, unsigned int>,
>>> std::allocator<std::pair<unsigned int, unsigned int> > >,
>>> std::less<unsigned int>, std::allocator<std::pair<unsigned int const,
>>> std::vector<std::pair<unsigned int, unsigned int>,
>>> std::allocator<std::pair<unsigned int, unsigned int> > > > > >*, bool,
>>> RDKit::SparseIntVect<unsigned int>&)+0x148
>>>
>>> It's difficult to know what's wrong, but thought it might be worth
>>> asking if anything in the Morgan fingerprint code has changed over that
>>> timeframe?
>>> It might be related to threading as the fingerprint generation is being
>>> done inside Java streams.
>>>
>>> Tim
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> Rdkit-discuss mailing list
>> Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss

Reply via email to